February 26, 2021 Find out more June 13, 2014 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Government closes two news media, police attack journalists YemenMiddle East – North Africa Follow the news on Yemen News News United Nations: press freedom situation “deeply worrying” in Yemen, according to RSF February 11, 2021 Find out more RSF_en YemenMiddle East – North Africa to go further Yemeni journalist killed, nine wounded in Aden airport explosions News Receive email alerts Two news media owned by former President Ali Abdallah Saleh that have a reputation for tendentious news reporting – Al-Yemen Al-Youm TV and the Al-Yemen Al-Youm newspaper – were raided and closed on 11 June by members of the presidential guard.Sultan Al-Barakani, the deputy general-secretary of the ruling General People’s Congress told Agence France-Presse that “President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi took the decision to close them with the cabinet’s approval. The GPC is also the former former president’s party.” “Presidential Guard forces closed the headquarters of the TV station and the newspaper and seized their equipment,” Barakani added.The government newspaper Al-Thawra (The Revolution) said: “Al-Yemen Al-Youm incited hatred and violence and jeopardized social peace, thereby constituting a threat to the state’s security and stability.” It added: “The communication ministry never issued a licence to Al-Yemen Al-Youm TV and the station’s management never bothered to request once. And they continued to behave in the same way after the former president’s removal.”The closures come at a time of mounting social tension resulting from water and electricity outages and fuel shortages that have been paralyzing Sanaa and prompting repeated demonstrations in recent days.About 1,000 people took part in the latest demonstration on 11 June. President Hadi announced a cabinet reshuffle the same day.“We urge the authorities to immediately and unconditionally end the arbitrary closure of these media,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Media may not, under any circumstances, be closed as a result of just a political decision. At the same time, media and journalists must demonstrate independence and professionalism, play a watchdog role and avoid fuelling political tension and disputes.”RWB added: “We are also very worried about police violence against journalists, especially when they are covering demonstrations. We point out that the UN Human Rights Council adopted a resolution on 28 March recognizing the importance of the role that journalists play by covering protests. The authorities are responsible for guaranteeing journalists’ safety.”For no apparent reason, members of the security forces attacked Sky News correspondent Mohamed Al-Kadhi, smashing his equipment, while he was doing a report on the month of Ramada on 12 June.Riot police used teargas and live rounds to disperse journalists who were demonstrating outside the “14 October” printing press in Aden in 7 June in protest against the manager’s alleged corruption. The police also targeted journalists who were there just to cover the protest. According to Marwan Al-Janzir, the head of the Aden branch of the Journalists’ Union, and Workers’ Union general secretary Nawfel Rajah, 15 journalists and 20 employees of the printing press were beaten and threatened at gunpoint by riot police before being forced to leave. One journalist, Hani Al-Mohtadi, was detained for an hour.Police threatened and attacked TV cameramen who were in the Aser district of the capital on 4 June to cover a demonstration demanding an end it the war in Amran, the governorate to the north of Sanaa governorate. Al-Jazeera Musbasher’s Mansour Allaw, Sky News Arabia’s Mohamed Sallama and Al-Arabiya’s Abdullah Al-Sofi were all beaten by police and forbidden to cover the demonstration. Organisation Help by sharing this information Fixer for foreign reporters held in Aden for past five months News January 6, 2021 Find out more
President Trump said at his daily coronavirus briefing Sunday that he hoped to reach an agreement for additional funding on Monday. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), chairman of the committee overseeing small businesses, addressed the criticism Monday morning on CNBC, saying that hotels and restaurants are some of the first and hardest hit companies and that many of their locations are owned by true small businesses or individuals.But he said that there have been “some people approved, some companies, that I believe should not have been, even under the intent of the law, and that comes down to the certification process and how they were certified into the system.” Some critics point out that executives at larger chains often receive multimillion-dollar annual compensation packages. Other chains, such as Marriott and Hilton, have been criticized for inflating the value of their shares in recent years with share buybacks and dividend payments that left less cash on hand to pay workers once the pandemic hit.Some chains, including those big hoteliers, have since cut executive pay and paused buybacks and dividends. Hilton said it is not seeking support from the Treasury Department. Mnuchin has called the PPP a success, saying in a statement Friday that the program provided funding to more than 1.6 million small businesses in all 50 states. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) criticized the program, saying that “companies that are not being harmed at all by the coronavirus crisis have the ability to receive taxpayer-funded loans that can be forgiven.” Sign up for our Coronavirus Updates newsletter to track the outbreak. All stories linked in the newsletter are free to access. FOOTNOTE: Erica Werner contributed to this report. “Late last week, when it was announced that funding for the PPP had been exhausted, businesses across the country were understandably up in arms,” the two wrote in a letter posted online. “If this act were written for small businesses, how is it possible that so many independent restaurants whose employees needed just as much help were unable to receive funding?” In all, more than 70 publicly traded companies have reported receiving money from the program, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. White House, GOP Face Heat After Hotel And Restaurant Chains Helped Run Small Business Program Dry “We now know that the first phase of the PPP was underfunded, and many who need it most, haven’t gotten any assistance.”Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who has tried to defend the program in recent days, wrote on Twitter that he was “glad to see” Shake Shack return the money. With millions of unemployed, hotel industry lobbies to spend stimulus on other needs But after intensive lobbying by the restaurant and hotel industries during the weeks leading to the passage of the $2 trillion Cares Act economic stimulus package, Congress allowed separate subsidiaries and locations to apply as businesses, even if they were part of a national or international chain. Transparency of the small business spending has also become a paramount issue, as the legislation does not require the Small Business Administration to disclose the recipients, even though the agency typically discloses the name, address and executives for loans received. Ruth’s Chris Steak House, a chain that has 150 locations and is valued at $250 million, reported receiving $20 million in funding from the small business portion of the economic stimulus legislation called the Paycheck Protection Program. The Potbelly chain of sandwich shops, which has more than 400 locations and a value of $89 million, reported receiving $10 million last week.Shake Shack, a $1.6 billion burger-and-fries chain based in New York City, received $10 million. After complaints from small business advocates after the fund went dry, company founder Danny Meyer and chief executive Randy Garutti announced Sunday evening that they would return the money. April 20, 2020 at 9:37 a.m. CDT “I think we are getting close to a deal,” he said. Leading congressional Democrats are pressing the Trump administration to provide more data about how the money is being distributed. As the program ran out of money, however, leaving thousands of small businesses without money to pay their workers, criticism mounted about some of the money going to national brands.The initial PPP “was flawed from top to bottom,” said Florida small business owners Duncan and Rita MacDonald-Korth. “The program has done very little to help genuine small businesses and instead has benefited large companies who have used subsidiary entities to benefit disproportionately and unfairly.” Ruth’s Chris, a steakhouse chain based in New Orleans, sought the stimulus money so that the company would be “well-positioned to emerge from this situation a strong and viable entity,” it said in a statement to the Wall Street Journal. “The vast majority of these loans — 74 percent of them — were for under $150,000, demonstrating the accessibility of this program to even the smallest of small businesses,” Mnuchin said. He told CNN on Sunday that an additional $300 billion “should be sufficient to reach almost everybody.” Executives at some chains have defended the PPP the way it is written, saying that the size of the parent company matters little because most of the money is required to go to workers, as a minimum of three-quarters of each loan must go to payroll in order for the government to forgive the debt.“Employees don’t care if we’re big or we’re a small business. They just want their job back,” said Jon E. Bortz, founder, and chief executive of Bethesda-based Pebblebrook Hotel Trust and board chairman for the American Hotel and Lodging Association, the industry’s top lobbying group. AHLA has also argued that hotel owners should not have to spend three-quarters of stimulus funding on the payroll. The federal government gave national hotel and restaurant chains millions of dollars in grants before the $349 billion programs ran out of moneyThursday, leading to a backlash that prompted one company to give the money back and a Republican senator to say that “millions of dollars are being wasted.” In their letter, the Shake Shack executives said they were trying to do the best they could for their employees under the rules created by the government, but they acknowledged that other businesses could use the money more than they could. Some of the companies receiving money are clients of JPMorgan Chase, adding fuel to criticism that Wall Street banks had helped their clients obtain large amounts. The bank put out a statement Sunday saying that it is “proud to have secured more funding for small businesses than anyone else in the industry” and that 80 percent of its PPP loans have been for businesses with less than $5 million in revenue. The couple created a petition asking that the program be limited to companies with fewer than 250 employees and that half of it be reserved for those with 50 employees or fewer. Thousands of traditional small businesses were unable to get funding from the program before it ran dry. As Congress and the White House near a deal to add an additional $310 billion to the program, some are calling for additional oversight and rule changes to prevent bigger chains from accepting any more money. Trump administration, congressional leaders near deal on virus aid that includes a major boost for small businesses “Our people would benefit from a $10 million PPP loan but we’re fortunate to now have access to capital that others do not. Until every restaurant that needs it has had the same opportunity to receive assistance, we’re returning ours,” they wrote. “I am concerned that many businesses with thousands of employees have found loopholes to qualify for these loans meant for small businesses,” Scott said. “Unfortunately, when it comes to the PPP, millions of dollars are being wasted. Thus multiple Ruth’s Chris locations could apply under separate entities even though the parent company employed about 5,740 people at the end of last year, according to public filings. Other industries and advocates lobbied against affiliation rules as well, including the private equity industry.Hotels, with three-quarters of their rooms empty and nearly 4 million people out of work, have been taking advantage of the program. Philadelphia’s Hersha Hospitality Trust and Condor Hospitality Trust, a Maryland-based owner of 15 hotels in eight states, reported last week that they had applied for loans. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), wrote to Mnuchin and Small Business Administration Administrator Jovita Carranza on Friday asking that PPP be replenished. They said they had no idea that the program would run out of money so quickly and that they understood the uproar. JPMorgan explained that larger companies may have been served more quickly because its commercial banking unit, which serves larger clients, was able to complete “most of the applications it received” while many more applications poured in from traditional small businesses.The PPP program was intended to benefit workers at businesses and nonprofit employers with fewer than 500 employees that are unable to obtain credit elsewhere, according to the Small Business Act, which formed the basis for the program. With program out of money, backlash prompts executives at Shake Shack to return a $10 million loan.By Jonathan O’Connell FacebookTwitterCopy LinkEmail
A U.S. District Court judge in Davenport, Iowa sentenced Lorie Kristine Bentler, 44, of Salem, Iowa, to 30 months in federal prison last week for embezzling more than $250,000 from a merged credit union she managed.Judge Stephanie M. Rose also ordered Bentler to pay $249,250 in restitution and five years of supervised release after serving her prison sentence. continue reading » 1SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblr
Liverpool defender Martin Skrtel insists he does not feel guilty about the challenge on Manchester United goalkeeper David de Gea which resulted in his three-match ban. Press Association The Slovakia international, currently away preparing for a Euro 2016 qualifier at home to Luxembourg on Friday, failed in his appeal against a violent conduct charge. Skrtel had argued the action of standing on De Gea’s right shin as he chased a through-ball in the final seconds of Sunday’s 2-1 defeat at Anfield was unintentional but an independent panel disagreed with him. The 30-year-old has continued to profess his innocence even after his ban was confirmed, meaning he misses Premier League matches against Arsenal and Newcastle, plus an FA Cup quarter-final replay at Blackburn. “It feels strange because we appealed against those charges and still I was hit by a three-match ban,” he told his personal website martin-skrtel.com. “I didn’t want to stamp on him. It was an accident and I didn’t do it on purpose. I don’t feel guilty. “It was a long ball and he went towards me and I wanted to jump over him. Simple as that.” Press Association Sport understands the defender is unlikely to be punished after he posted a picture of clowns on his Instagram account on Wednesday – which has been widely viewed as his comment on those who sat on the panel and decided the outcome of the hearing. Skrtel will be joined on the sidelines by Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard, who will also serve a similar three-match ban after his moment of madness saw him sent off less than a minute after coming on as a substitute for the second half after stamping on United midfielder Ander Herrera. With Skrtel and several of his team-mates away on international duty the club’s Under-21s squad have been invited to train at the first-team’s Melwood base. However, one of their number Jordan Lussey will be getting competitive action elsewhere after completed a loan move to Bolton, currently 17th in the Sky Bet Championship. The 20-year-old follows the likes of Sheyi Ojo and Jerome Sinclair, who have both joined relegation-threatened Championship side Wigan on loan in the last six weeks to gain first-team football experience. Fellow youngsters Kevin Stewart and Jack Dunn have both joined League Two side Burton Albion on loan deals, having previously spent time at Cheltenham this season.